FRANCIS JEFFRY PELLETIER and RICHMOND H. THOMASON TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF LINGUISTICS AND PHILOSOPHY
نویسندگان
چکیده
A BibTeX-formatted bibliography of the first twenty-five years of Linguistics and Philosophy, with topic keywords, is available at www.eecs.umich.edu/∼rthomaso/l-and-p/. Rather than attempting an overview of what has been accomplished in the pages of this journal, or even a proper introduction to the papers in this issue that celebrate its twentyfifth anniversary, we instead try to present our own view of why each of the two subjects is profoundly and enduringly important to the other. The lack of italics in the title is intentional: we are concerned here more with Linguistics and Philosophy than with Linguistics and Philosophy, although of course the two are related. Our discussion begins with a general rationale, which we illustrate with two case studies, dealing with natural language metaphysics and with some philosophical issues in the semantics of words. The case studies are meant to provide examples of the sort of interesting, nontrivial interactions between Linguistics and Philosophy that create a special need and niche for Linguistics and Philosophy. They illustrate the many, and many unexpected, ways that the two fields affect one another. The role of L&P in fostering this interaction has been enormous and salutary for both fields.
منابع مشابه
Issues of Mass and Count: Dealing with 'Dual-Life' Nouns
The topics of +MASS and +COUNT have been studied for many decades in philosophy (e.g., (Quine, 1960; Pelletier, 1975)), linguistics (e.g., (McCawley, 1975; Allan, 1980; Krifka, 1991)) and psychology (e.g., (Middleton et al., 2004; Barner et al., 2009). More recently, interest from within computational linguistics has studied the issues involved (e.g., (Pustejovsky, 1991; Bond, 2005; Schmidtke a...
متن کاملHolism and Compositionality
A brief acquaintance with the web shows that the terms ‘holism’ and ‘compositionality’ are used in many different fields, both academic and non-academic. And given any two academic fields, it is usually not obvious that the terms mean the same to the practitioners. Even just within philosophy and linguistics it seems that rather different conceptions are in play when we read any two different a...
متن کاملAbility and Action
This is part of a larger project that is motivated in part by linguistic considerations and by the philosophical literature in action theory and the logic of ability, but that is also meant to suggest ways in which planning formalisms could be modified to provide an account of the role of ability in planning and practical reasoning. In this version for the CSR workshop, I have suppressed most o...
متن کاملAbility, Action, and Context
This paper proposes a formalization of ability that is motivated in part by linguistic considerations and by the philosophical literature in action theory and the logic of ability, but that is also meant to match well with planning formalisms, and so to provide an account of the role of ability in practical reasoning. Some of the philosophical literature concerning ability, and in particular [A...
متن کاملFrom Discourse to Logic - Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, edited by Gennaro Chierchia, Pauline Jacobson, and Francis J. Pelletier, volume 42), 1993, viii + 713 pp. Hardbound in two volumes, Part 1 ISBN 0-7923-1027-6, no price listed; Part 2, ISBN 0-7923-2402-1, no price listed; two volume set, ISBN 0-7923-2403-X, $172.00, £112.00, Dfl 280.Paperbound in one volume, ISBN 0-792...
متن کامل